Onion

Visible Results

Phytotoxicity and weed pressure both impact yield quantity. In the example below ARA proves it doesn't just do the job, it actually gets better results than standard broadcast spraying

No herbicides are applied—used as a control in tests. Weak yield results due to uncontrolled weed pressure.

Non-Treated (Class mm)

AI targets specific weeds, spraying only them with selective herbicides. Result shows a higher yield than broadcast spraying.

ARA, Selective (Class mm)

AI sprays only weeds with non-selective herbicides, avoiding crops. Result shows a higher yield than broadcast spraying.

ARA, Non-Selective (Class mm)

Herbicides are sprayed evenly across an entire field, covering both weeds & crops. Weed pressure is controlled, but yield suffered from phytotoxicity.

Broadcast Spraying (Class mm)

We have treated more than 1,750 hectares of onions with ARA, which has allowed us to achieve savings of up to 96% on raw chemical inputs. Of course, this depends on weed pressure and crop growth stage, but we are very satisfied with the results.

— Angus Hill United Kingdom Agronomist & Farm Support Consultant

Proven Results: Data from 3,000 Onion Missions

Our study, which analyzed nearly 3,000 ARA sprayer missions in onion fields, reveals that ARA saved nearly 80% of herbicide per hectare in 2023 compared to conventional broadcast spraying. Furthermore, ARA efficiently eliminated weeds while reducing the phytotoxic effects of chemical inputs, ensuring higher yields per hectare compared to both conventional application and untreated control.

Untreated Control

No treatment applied. Onions and weeds are in direct competition for soil nutrients, water and light.

Broadcast Conventional Treatment

Broadcast treatment applied. Onion plants are weakened by the contact with the herbicides.

ARA Spot Spray Treatment

Onion plot treated with ARA. Precise spraying ensures clean rows and vigorous, healthy crops.